gvSIG feature requests #3610
The order of the fields at the 'Info by point' tool should be the same than in the table
| Status: | Closed | % Done: | 0% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Spent time: | - | |
| Assignee: | - | |||
| Category: | Document table | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| gvSIG version: | 2.2.0 | Add-on resolve version: | ||
| Keywords: | 2310 | Add-on resolve build: | ||
| Has patch: | Proyecto: | |||
| Add-on name: | Unknown | Hito: | ||
| Add-on version: |
Description
The order of the fields at the 'Info by point' tool is alphabetical, but it should be the same than in the table of attributes.
History
#1
Updated by Antonio Falciano over 8 years ago
- Target version set to 2.3.0-2447-final (rev. org.gvsig.desktop-2.0.153)
Mario Carrera wrote:
The order of the fields at the 'Info by point' tool is alphabetical, but it should be the same than in the table of attributes.
I'm completely agree with Mario. Furthermore the special field "ogr_geometry" should not be mixed with the alphanumerical ones. It should be the first and also represented with a different style.
#2
Updated by Joaquín del Cerro Murciano over 8 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.3.0-2447-final (rev. org.gvsig.desktop-2.0.153) to 2.4.0-2850-final (rev. org.gvsig.desktop-2.0.220)
#3
Updated by Álvaro Anguix almost 7 years ago
- Target version deleted (
2.4.0-2850-final (rev. org.gvsig.desktop-2.0.220))
#4
Updated by Antonio Falciano over 6 years ago
The order of fields is very important especially when we are working with tables containing several fields. The priority to fix this should be very high, although I see that the target version is undefined at the moment.
#5
Updated by Álvaro Anguix over 4 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed